When the average church member hears the term “systematic theology” they get a nervous feeling in the pit of their stomach. Thoughts race through their mind that range from “I could never understand that,” to “I would never need that.” Both suspicions reveal underlying problems.
At one end are those who feel that they could never understand the truths in the book. These people worry about the depths of material contained in such a book and assume they will drown. The problem is that a systematic theology is a compendium of the doctrines of the Bible. This is not mere philosophy or a concise encyclopedia – this is a book that serves as commentary to aid its reader in the understanding of the Bible. Are there parts of a systematic theology that are dense and difficult? Absolutely! However, every one of these parts is derived from Scripture, and though even Peter admitted that parts of God’s Word are difficult, understanding them is possible and beneficial. We are finite humans and as such we have finite minds that do not have limitless understanding, but we have a perfect helper who dwells in us that will enable us to understand God’s perfect Word.
The other end of the spectrum is populated by those who feel that a systematic theology contains too much information. They are content with their level of knowledge, and believe that certain doctrines are above their pay grade. I will be the first to admit that there are debates that occur in the halls of academia that may be superfluous, but, to shun a whole discipline based on the questionable nature of the necessity of some doctrines is foolish. I have heard many say, “Who cares whether or not Jesus could sin [he could not by the way], the point is that he did not.” “Who cares what the book of Revelation means, Jesus is coming back and that is all that matters.” Paul tells us in 2 Timothy that all of God’s Word is inspired and to deny parts of Scripture questions the logic of God for including them in Scripture. If God put it in the Bible I believe that it is the responsibility and joy of the follower of Christ to seek to understand it. Perhaps the most condemning assumption of such
So the question is begged, “What are the benefits of a systematic theology?”
- A systematic theology provides answers to many questions that you are asking.
- A systematic theology teaches you how to think about biblical issues. So many Christians and Denominations are guilty of taking a verse that at face value may make a certain claim and building a practice or dogma on it. A good theology shows how to understand a verse in its immediate context and how to balance it against the context of the entire Scriptures.
- A systematic theology deepens your relationship with God. The more I understand about God and the way that he works, the more I fall in love with our Savior.
- A systematic theology enhances your appreciation of the Scriptures. As you study the depth of these truths and the unity of Scriptures you cannot help but believe that the Bible is a work of Divine superintendence.
- A systematic theology aids in your sanctification. The more I have studied God’s Word the more evident my sinfulness has become and the greater my desire for righteousness has been.
- A systematic theology trains you in your faith. By knowing God’s Word you are better equipped to answer the questions of your friends and family. I love helping people understand the Bible, but it was never God’s plan for Christians to use their ministers as a crutch. I am not here to answer all your questions, I am here to help you understand how to answer them for yourself, and this is a way to do that.
These are just some benefits of a systematic theology, and if you take the time and make the effort to read one and to truly imbibe the doctrines therein, you will find many benefits too.
What are some good theologies? I should preface this by saying that of these volumes I do not agree with everything in any of them. Please do not take my recommendation of these as a recommendation of everything in them. I greatly respect all of these men, but you must still read them with discretion and weigh what they say against the Word of God. You may click on the titles of the book to purchase them.
The two which I agree with the most would be James P. Boyce’s Abstract of Systematic Theology (available online) and James M. Pendleton’s Christian Doctrine. Dr. Boyce was the founder of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and President of the Southern Baptist Convention from 1872-1879 and 1888. Pendleton was a pastor and baptist theologian who grew up in Christian Co. Kentucky and pastored in Hopkinsville and Bowling Green. The books are excellent in their quality and verity, but due to their age are not able to address some of the issues that have arisen in the past 100 years. Having said that, I highly recommend them. It doesn’t hurt to note that the two best baptist theologies had their genesis in Kentucky.
Louis Berkhof’s Systematic Theology has the best treatment of the doctrine of salvation, it is magisterial. I will issue a strong disclaimer that my greatest issue with this book is that he is thoroughly Presbyterian. I do not agree with some of his view of the church, and I totally disagree with his understanding of baptism [he does not require immersion], but he does a passable job explaining the Baptist view of baptism. Though I have my disagreements this is probably the one that I have found most helpful and affecting.
A Theology for the Church edited by Dr. Danny Akin. This is a theology written by a number of leading Southern Baptist scholars. It is helpful in that it allows the reader to get a good number of perspectives.
Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology and the subsequent Bible Doctrine which serves as an abridged version. Both are great in their structure and the questions at the end of the chapters. I am not particularly fond of his discussion of the church and spiritual gifts, but overall this is great. This book is probably the most used in colleges and seminaries. While it is not my favorite, I would recommend one of these two books as the ones to purchase if you are only going to read one, as they are the most thorough and the organization helps for frequent reference.
Millard Erickson too has a proper book, Christian Theology, and a later abridgement, Introducing Bible Doctrine. Erickson’s book is likely the second most used book. Erickson does not differentiate between the roles of men and women (a position referred to as egalitarianism).
Any or all of these books are excellent. If I can help you further in your selection of a book for you please leave a comment.